An agreement to restrict the marriage of persons who do not have minors is null and void. The law does not require everyone to marry. But if someone agrees not to marry at all, it is contrary to public order and therefore not abundant. In addition, an agreement in which a person agrees not to marry a particular person is also annulled because he opposes public order in England, both agreements being illegal and unenforceable. However, in India, only agreements that appear to be entered into for gambling purposes in disputes and for breaches or to repress others, by encouraging lay litigation, are not enforced, but not all support and championship agreements are enforced. Agreements that infringe on marital obligations are contrary to public policy and are non-agreeable. A contractual condition could be in opposition to public order if the state has an interest in preventing the state`s condition. The view of treaties, contrary to public policy, has changed over time. For example, a contractual condition that can be maintained today could have been contrary to public policy in the past. When an agreement restricts the statute of limitations, it is anniated. Because their goal is to defeat the legal provisions. If, in an agreement, the counterparty commits a crime, the agreement is contrary to public order and is non-aeig.

Similarly, an agreement to compensate a person for the consequences of his or her criminal act is not applicable if it is contrary to public policy. Agreements on the use of the influence of corruption in obtaining government jobs, titles or honours are illegal and therefore unenforceable. Indeed, if such agreements are valid, corruption will increase and lead to the inefficiency of public services. Example: A and B were rival traders in a locality of Calcutta. B agreed to pay A, a sum if he closed his store there. To do so, but B refused to pay him the money. The agreement was not reached, so the money could not be recovered. In principle, it is presumed that a contract or act is contrary to public order if it results in a violation of the law, harms citizens or harms the state. In general, public policy means that courts sometimes invalidate a contract because it is contrary to the common good. Any trade in enemies is contrary to public order. It is therefore illegal and not aeig.

However, if a contract is concluded during the peace period and a war subsequently breaks out, one of the two things can lead to the suspension of the treaty or termination, depending on the intention of the parties.